Stark delays mine decision

 
LOADING
Jan 05, 2008 - 04:01:24 CST
SOUTH HEART - Bob Kuylen, of South Heart, says the coal mine possibly coming to his land will be a stroke of good fortune for him and his brothers.

They own much of the surface land where the newest mine in North Dakota in more than two decades would be located. They would be paid lease income so the coal could be mined out from under them.

On a warm sunny day in January, when he and his brother Pat Kuylen are loading out $10 spring wheat, it's hard to see the benefit of losing a place where the lush trees of South Heart Creek wind along a small valley on an otherwise treeless plain.

He said the mine would be something like striking oil - an unanticipated bonus of land ownership, one that makes up for years of getting hailed or droughted out.

Kuylen says his neighbors will have a different experience, trying to farm around a coal mine. They deserve time to ask questions and get answers before a coal mine interrupts the quilt pattern of farm life in the quiet countryside, he said.

"Some don't want to see it. and I don't blame them," he said.

The Stark County Planning and Zoning Board feels the same way.

Faced with a packed meeting room Thursday night in Dickinson, the board voted to table a zoning request from Great Northern Power Development to rezone 17 acres around the Kuylen farm for the coal mine.

Great Northern, a subsidiary that owns millions of railroad coal acres in North Dakota, wants to mine lignite and use it as feedstock for North Dakota's second synthetic fuels plant.

The coal mine and the plant would bring a couple of hundred permanent jobs and turn coal into a gas that would join the underground flow in a nearby Montana-Dakota Utilities gas pipeline.

Only last month, the company announced it had scrapped plans to build a coal-fired power plant in favor of making gas from coal, instead.

The process of making gas from coal allows the capture of carbon dioxide, and makes CO2 available for enhancing oil recovery, both environmental and economic wins in today's energy world.

One of Kuylen's country neighbors is Neil Tangen, who keeps 60-some horses on about 80 acres during the winter and then transfers them to a seasonal horse riding concession in Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

Tangen is vice chairman of the Badlands Area Resource Council, a subsidiary of the Dakota Resource Council.

Tangen said getting the mine zoning tabled is a victory for his group and the 500 people who signed a petition asking the zoners to require an environmental impact statement before giving a zoning OK.

"If it's going to impact your life, you've got to get up and say something," Tangen said. "We set 'em (Great Northern) back for a couple of weeks, maybe longer."

Great Northern's landman Neal Messer said the zoning delay was not a setback, though in a perfect world the zoning hearing would have stuck to zoning, rather than turn into an environmental debate.

"They (zoning board) probably did what they needed to do," Messer said.

Zoning members Russ Hoff and George Nodland split their vote, but they both agree that giving South Heart folks and Great Northern more time to talk is a good outcome, either way.

They both support the project and think it represents a great opportunity for development for the region.

However, they could hear a lot of concern at the meeting on such things as roads and the effect of mining on underground water wells.

Hoff said, "The big issue was water."

Nodland said the timing was a little fast and that Great Northern should have had public meetings first.

Messer said those meetings are being scheduled now, starting with one in South Heart the week of Jan. 20, and then regularly afterward as long as people still seem interested in attending them.

Tangen said it's been Great Northern's practice to hold telephone-invite-only meetings. It's time for the public to get filled in, he said.

Nodland and Hoff said the zoning matter could be voted on as soon as early February.

Great Northern plans to file a mine permit application with the Public Service Commission later this month, and Messer said it will stick to that schedule.

The company hopes to start plant construction by 2010, though the mine would probably not be developed until 2011.

The coal mine is only one aspect of the project. Great Northern will have to clear a series of approvals before it constructs a plant that produces 90 million cubic feet daily of synthetic natural gas, roughly half the output of the Dakota Gasification Co. plant at Beulah.

Pat Kuylen said he feels like he has to consider the mine and the plant as progress.

"We need gas and electricity, and somebody has to sacrifice," he said. He said he can't quite imagine what a coal mine would look like out on the hills and fields where he's lived and farmed all his life; he knows only that it will mean a lot of adjustments for everyone.

Josh Wagner, the Kuylens' neighbor, pulled into the yard with a gleaming maroon-cab semi to help haul grain to the terminal at Gladstone.

The Wagners would live at the edge of the coal mine, not far from the Kuylens, and their lot would be more the downside, of mine traffic and noise, without the financial up.

Wagner has a live-and-let-live attitude. He says he's not opposed, but he does have environmental concerns, primarily because it's well known that coal mining does affect water quantity and quality.

"There's going to be good and there's going to be bad," Wagner said. "When it comes, we'll deal with what's there."

(Reach reporter Lauren Donovan at 888-303-5511 or lauren@;westriv.com.)
   Printer friendly version
Stark delays mine decision
Comments

Victory!! wrote on Jan 5, 2008 12:35 PM:

" FINALLY someone with some sense. Life is NOT about dollar signs... there is more to it then that. How 'bout that- a coal company wishing it wasn't an environmental debate... (Because they stand no chance to win?) They want to say this is going to be such a environmentally friendly plant, then they should be happy to get into an environmental debate. "

I can read wrote on Jan 5, 2008 12:30 PM:

" I read the November Stark county zoning meeting minutes. This same Neal Messer ws at the meeting, to ask to be on the agenda for the next meeting. While there, an elderly man was making the request to put a trailer house, temporarily, on his land. Neal Messer spoke out against it, because he owned land ONE MILE away and was concerned as to what this would do to his property values. He wants to tell residents living near the proposed plant that they are "out of the buffer zone" and wont be affected. I gotta ask- what is the buffer zone for being affected by a trailer house? "

The people have spoken wrote on Jan 5, 2008 12:27 PM:

" What this article doesn't say is that over TWICE as many people spoke out against it, as for it. And those 6 that spoke out in favor of it stand to profit from it. (Go figure they would support such a project) The fact is, the coal company, and their snake of a spokesman, were not able to provide answers to the questions asked. Sure, they tried to talk around them, "this is about zoning, not the environment", but people saw through it. Great Northern needs to go back to Texas, Neal Messer needs to go back to his shady realtor business- leave our farms, our land, and our community alone. All of you whining about lost jobs, have to ask, Are your kids REALLY going to come back to work at a COAL plant? Doubtful- this is not going to be what brings them home. This is going to be what drives others away. "

ck wrote on Jan 5, 2008 11:01 AM:

" The mining company was completely unprepared to answer the hard questions. They gave general answers to clear questions. One of the biggest concerns was water. When asked what they would do if water wells were destroyed the answer was they will replace them. The FACT is that in coal country, Mclean, Oliver and mercer counties...NO wells have ever been replaced after strip mining. Mining companies own 90 sections of land that has not ever been turned back over to farmers and ranchers. Why? NO WATER. The Zoning Board did the right thing by tabling this application. They cannot answer the questions. OVer 500, nearly 600 people signed the petition wanting more information before buying into their lies. That is what they need to do. Besides, very few people out there want this thing and people have to remember that it is their land. It does not belong to the mining company or to the state. these are three and four generation farms that want to he five and six generation farms. Great Northern should just go away. Coal projects all over the counrty are being turned down. This zoning application was a one sentence application with a typo, a map and a list of the sections they want to change zoning in. In waterloo Iowa a similar project with at 111 page app was turned away for being incomplete...we deserve more. "

I want to move back to ND wrote on Jan 5, 2008 9:31 AM:

" With higher gas and electric prices coming, maybe these local people should get a price break for living so close to a refinery,coal plant or mine, But instead they always have to pay a higher price. "

ex wrote on Jan 5, 2008 8:28 AM:

" Here we go again. Let's stop another opportunity to provide good paying jobs for ND residents. This mind set has got to change if you want to encourage young people to stay in ND. "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY